
This documentary by Alex Jones is an absolutely incredible report on the history of government sponsored terror across the globe. It includes shocking facts about "false flag" operations of the past decades, from Nazi Germany to today.
While browsing through the periodicals at my local library, I came upon an editorial in the June edition of The Nation that was relevant to my study. Surprisingly enough, the article was openly critical of not only the Israeli raid of the Freedom Flotilla, but on U.S. foreign policy regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict.
The issue at hand was the Israel navy’s attack on a flotilla of ships full of human rights activists, diplomats, government officers, and civilians from around the globe on international waters. The ships were intending to deliver humanitarian aid for the people of Gaza, who have been suffering under an Israeli blockade for more than four years. This action is a result of a policy enacted under the support of the United States, and the results have devastated Gaza and its people. The article cites UN agencies as stating that the formal economy has collapsed, leaving more than 60 percent of people food insecure, 80 percent dependent on the UN for sustenance, and rising levels of malnutrition. In addition, a weakened infrastructure has left a decrease in energy so great that there is limited access to food production and storage as well as safe drinking water. Because of the blockade, thousands of citizens have been homeless since Israel’s 2008-2009 military assault on the area.
The article goes on to criticize the U.S.’s one-sided policy, as well as the medias dishonest reporting of basic facts about the Israel-Palestine conflict. The writer states that these events would not have been possible without the “active collusion or cowardly silence of the vast majority of the Democratic Party and liberal policy establishment;” however, considers it positive that recent events have focused our attention on Gaza’s blockade, and calls for its end immediately.
It was so refreshing to read such a brave and critical article on this matter. I can only hope that more Americans will take such a brave stance on this matter.
In this book, Hosseini follows the lives of two Afghani women in the late 20th century. The women in the story are born into extremely different circumstances. Mariam, the elder of the two, grows up poor on the outskirts of her village. She is raised by her mother, who teaches her that education is worthless for women, and whose own mental illnesses keeps her from showing Mariam a mother’s unconditional love. Mariam is forced to marry young and soon finds that she is nearly worthless (by society’s standards) to the man who has married her. Laila, on the other hand, is a beautiful, intelligent young woman, deeply valued by her father who keeps nothing out of her reach, including her education. She is expected to do great things and bring honor to her family. Hosseini’s merging of these two characters’ lives highlights for the reader that war spares no one. These women both fall victim to oppression and despair, which brings them closer together than anyone may imagine.
One of the most startling scenes in the book took place in a hospital during the regime of the Taliban. Laila was in labor, and was forced to travel to a women’s hospital. Upon her arrival, she finds the hospital dirty and without anesthetic. A nurse if forced to keep watch during surgery lest the doctor be found performing surgery without her burka.
Although the book is most likely overly used as the ONLY source on the Middle East in secondary English courses, its value should not be taken for granted. Hosseini’s story paints a picture of a wounded Afghanistan, and highlights specific lives within the struggle. Any attempt to engage young readers in a sympathetic portrait of the people of the Middle East is an improvement over the way in which they are too commonly dehumanized in the majority of readily available popular culture.
If some ninety million little boys were having their penises amputated, would the world have acted to prevent it by now? You bet. -Geraldine Brooks
After reading Geraldine Brooks’ Nine Parts of Desire, I was left with a much better idea of the role of women in different parts of the Middle East. In her accounts, Brooks is careful to differentiate between the differences in Islam based on region. Although she paid close attention to the oppression of women based on religious beliefs and cultural customs, I felt that she gave voice to the opinion that many women choose to live veiled and restricted,while arguing that in some ways it could be considered the most progressive option available to them.
I particularly appreciated the background information this novel revealed about Muhammad and the founding principles of the Islamic faith. For educational purposes, Brooks does an excellent job defining key terms, such as the different schools of thought and the different acts associated with Islam. In this way, Nine Parts of Desire would be a useful tool in the secondary or college level course; although, one might carefully consider pairing it with a work that challenges the "anti-veil" feminist approach, such as Rethinking Muslim Women and the Veil: Challenging Historical and Modern Stereotypes, by Dr. Katherine Bullock. I have not yet studied this work, but I will post more about it soon.
In her book, Brooks carefully analyzes different interpretations of the Koran, and points out that many practices that oppress and brutalize women are not founded on the teachings of Muhammad at all, but merely ancient traditions that continue even today. It was horrifying for me to read that the practice of genital mutilation was legal even until 1994 within the United States. Brooks argues that more needs to be done to protect women who are threatened by their culture, such as granting the right to asylum to women who have a "well-founded fear of persecution." This suggestion, which would only help women with the means to escape their situation, seems to be the very least that should happen.
While I was reading this book, I kept trying to put myself in the position of the women in Brooks' stories. What if I were forbidden to leave the house without my father or my husband? What my daughter was mutilated on an operating table? As an unwed mother, I would be marginalized and scoffed at, if not imprisoned, or perhaps killed by my male relatives. It pains me to think of the women that are refused such basic human rights by their very own people, as the rest of the world keeps moving forward, turning a blind eye to them all.